Canara Robeco Infrastructure

Review Date: 11-04-2025

Beginning of Analysis

In the Infrastructure Fund category, Canara Robeco Infrastructure is the second ranked fund. The category has total 17 funds. The Canara Robeco Infrastructure has shown an excellent past performence in Infrastructure Fund. The fund has a Jensen Alpha of 6.14% which is higher than the category average of 3.55%. Here the fund has shown very good performance in terms of risk adjusted returns. The fund has a Sharpe Ratio of 0.92 which is higher than the category average of 0.84.
The past performance of the fund may or may not be sustained in the future. The review is not investment advice nor is it a recommendation to buy or sell funds. The ranking is based on proprietary methodology developed by bmsmoney. The methodology is based on the past performance of the funds and does not guarantee future performance.
Infrastructure Mutual Funds are ideal for long-term investors seeking to capitalize on the growth potential of the infrastructure sector. These funds invest in companies across various sub-sectors like construction, utilities, transportation, and energy, offering exposure to a diverse range of infrastructure-related businesses. While they provide the potential for long-term growth and alignment with economic development goals, they also carry higher risks due to their concentrated exposure to the infrastructure sector. Investors should have a long-term investment horizon and a moderate to high risk tolerance to invest in these funds. Additionally, monitoring government policies and economic trends is crucial for success.

Canara Robeco Infrastructure Return Analysis

• The fund has given a return of 2.46%, -2.57 and -16.08 in last one, three and six months respectively. In the same period the category average return was 3.17%, -4.14% and -16.34% respectively.
• The fund has given a return of 23.35% in last three years and rank 6th out of 17 funds in the category. In the same period the Nifty Infrastructure TRI return was 17.5%. The fund has given 5.85% more return than the benchmark return.
• Canara Robeco Infrastructure has given a return of 34.05% in last five years and category average returns is 33.46% in same period. The fund ranked 7th out of 17 funds in the category. In the same period the Nifty Infrastructure TRI return was 28.0%. The fund has given 6.05% more return than the benchmark return.
• The fund has given a return of 14.54% in last ten years and ranked 9th out of 17 funds in the category. In the same period the Nifty Infrastructure TRI return was 10.62%. The fund has given 3.92% more return than the benchmark return.
• The fund has given a SIP return of -27.62% in last one year whereas category average SIP return is -30.24%. The fund one year return rank in the category is 5th in 17 funds
• The fund has SIP return of 20.81% in last three years and ranks 6th in 17 funds. Hdfc Infrastructure Fund has given the highest SIP return (23.67%) in the category in last three years.
• The fund has SIP return of 26.67% in last five years whereas category average SIP return is 24.88%.

Canara Robeco Infrastructure Risk Analysis

• The fund has a standard deviation of 18.54 and semi deviation of 12.94. The category average standard deviation is 18.0 and semi deviation is 13.16.
• The fund has a Value at Risk (VaR) of -22.08 and a maximum drawdown of -23.3. The category average VaR is -21.21 and the maximum drawdown is -24.41. The fund has a beta of 0.93 which shows that fund is less volatile than the benchmark.

Standard deviation measures the fund's return volatility and Semi deviation focuses on downside volatility. Value at Risk (VaR) is a measure of the risk of investments. Maximum Drawdown is the maximum loss from a peak to a trough of a portfolio. Beta measures the volatility of the fund compared to the benchmark. A beta of 1 indicates that the fund will move in line with the benchmark. A beta of more than 1 indicates that the fund will be more volatile than the benchmark and vice versa.

Very Good Performance in Infrastructure Fund Category

Good Performance in Infrastructure Fund Category

Poor Performance in Infrastructure Fund Category

Very Poor Performance in Infrastructure Fund Category