• The Treynor Ratio is a performance metric for mutual funds, measuring returns earned above a risk-free investment per unit of market risk.
  • Advantages include risk-adjusted performance evaluation, simplicity, and usefulness for diversified portfolios.
  • Disadvantages involve ignoring unsystematic risk, dependence on beta accuracy, and lack of consideration for current market conditions.
  • The Treynor Ratio is a valuable tool for informed investment decisions but should not be used in isolation.

  • The Sortino Ratio is a risk-adjusted performance measure that evaluates mutual funds based on their downside volatility.
  • It emphasizes downside risk, making it useful for risk-averse investors concerned about capital preservation.
  • The Sortino Ratio helps investors choose funds aligned with their risk tolerance and investment goals.
  • It identifies consistent performers with better risk-adjusted returns.
  • However, the Sortino Ratio neglects the upside potential of investments.

  • The Sterling Ratio is a risk-adjusted measure of return on an investment that focuses on downside volatility.
  • Calculation: (CAGR - Risk-free Rate) / Average of the Largest Annual Losses.
  • Advantages: Emphasizes potential for loss, focuses on larger losses, and provides a realistic view of performance by considering a risk-free rate.
  • Disadvantages: Heavily relies on historical data and might overemphasize the impact of outliers.
  • In practice: the 'Fund A' example with a 10-year CAGR of 15%, risk-free rate of 6%, and five worst drawdowns resulted in a Sterling Ratio of 0.90, indicating a good risk-reward trade-off.
  • Empirical evidence from India suggests that funds with higher Sterling Ratios tend to perform better during downturns.
  • Important note: Investment decisions should not be solely based on the Sterling Ratio, consider other factors and metrics.